Like most articles that align Go strategy with real-life phenomena, this mangles the essence of game concepts like sente, gote, aji, seki, etc. People who writ

Like most articles that align Go strategy with real-life phenomena, this mangles the essence of game concepts like sente, gote, aji, seki, etc. People who write these articles either do not play the game or overstate the case for ... what exactly? Foisting a false narrative by appealing to Go's mystique? These writers are better off comparing their subjects to Monopoly or Chutes n' Ladders.