3 ms·
This is likely the best recent example (from last year): https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29634/trump-tweets-intelligence-image-after-irans-rocket-explosi
by capekwasright 6y ago
This is likely the best recent example (from last year):
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29634/trump-tweets-intelligence-image-after-irans-rocket-explosion-and-offers-them-best-wishes https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29634/trump-tweets-int...
- SoapSeller 6y agoIt doesn't looks like SAR to me(there are shadows, for example). More like standard optical image(the resolution and details are amazing, if it's a satellite, which is doubtful given the angle).
- sq_ 6y agoIIRC, the conclusion at the time was that that particular image was taken by an NRO KH-11 satellite - roughly equivalent to a Hubble Space Telescope pointed at earth and definitely not SAR.
- Someone1234 6y agoSupposedly this was taken by a KH-11 Block 4 (USA-224) which means this is cutting edge as of 2005. We're currently on Block 5 as of 2018. The biggest secrets within US Reconnaissance Satellites isn't really optical clarity anymore, it is their capabilities in other spectrums (and have supported at least infrared for 30+ years, but with signals intelligence well beyond that since).
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- capekwasright 6y agoCorrect; optical, not SAR. Should have made that clear in my original post.