3 ms·
Well, you need just one NAT to be cooperative, like a full cone. There's enough legitimate interest in NAT traversal that big NAT deployments like CGNATs tend t
by quantumofalpha 6y ago
Well, you need just one NAT to be cooperative, like a full cone. There's enough legitimate interest in NAT traversal that big NAT deployments like CGNATs tend to cooperate
Traversing non-cooperative fully symmetric NATs, which randomize ports, is hard enough also for pwnat. Though in theory should be doable - you just need a lot of patience to brute force ports (there's only 64k of them) until it finally clicks