5 ms·
I don't think anybody sane tries to get two machines behind different NATs to talk to each other without the NATs' cooperation in production.
by octoberfranklin 6y ago
I don't think anybody sane tries to get two machines behind different NATs to talk to each other without the NATs' cooperation in production.
- quantumofalpha 6y agoWell, you need just one NAT to be cooperative, like a full cone. There's enough legitimate interest in NAT traversal that big NAT deployments like CGNATs tend to cooperate Traversing non-cooperative fully symmetric NATs, which randomize ports, is hard enough also for pwnat. Though in theory should be doable - you just need a lot of patience to brute force ports (there's only 64k of them) until it finally clicks