4 ms·
Wasn't this already established by the supreme court? edit: it was an appeals court. so why is this a headline? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe
by aerovistae 6y ago
Wasn't this already established by the supreme court?
edit: it was an appeals court. so why is this a headline?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe
- alexeldeib 6y agoInterestingly, the OP was ruled by the same court as Glik v. Cunniffe. Different judges. Would be nice to see it ruled on by the Supreme Court to set precedent at that level, I'd assume there isn't a precedent from SC based on these two cases.
- hedora 6y agoThis was about a ban on secretly recording the police while they’re in public, which implies the on-duty police have fewer protections than normal citizens. The other case was about a law attempting to give police more protections than normal citizens.