Frightening, but extremely apropos that propaganda outlet Propornot is used as the benchmark to determine what is "reliable". Propornot first gained credibilit

Frightening, but extremely apropos that propaganda outlet Propornot is used as the benchmark to determine what is "reliable". Propornot first gained credibility as a source in a 2016 Washington Post article about "Russian disinformation". It was so hilariously bad that The Washington Post was quickly forced to amend the article with an editorial disclaimer about Propornot. A detailed writeup of this debacle was done at the time by The Intercept: https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/washington-post-disgracefully-promotes-a-mccarthyite-blacklist-from-a-new-hidden-and-very-shady-group/ https://theintercept.com/2016/11/26/washington-post-disgrace... Matt Taibi also chimed in at the time: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/the-washington-post-blacklist-story-is-shameful-and-disgusting-115978/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/the-...