3 ms·
I'm sure that helped someone, it isn't different from my answer and you only focused on patents not the "circular answer" for the universe of what the state say
by vmception 6y ago
I'm sure that helped someone, it isn't different from my answer and you only focused on patents not the "circular answer" for the universe of what the state says is anticompetitive. The real answer is a dissertation on enforcement actions and circuit court behaviors, which I was not going to write and there is no one answer.
Regarding patents, the article of the constitution is an instruction to Congress to secure rights for a "limited time". So maybe you needed to explain that since I guess it isn't common for people to know what the constitution says, in my world I just assume that.
- clankyclanker 6y agoYeah, I probably should've posted my comment aside your comment instead of in response to it. Regardless, I was trying to draw attention to the tradeoffs involved in the formation of the current system beyond simply saying "that's how it is." Being explicit about how we got here is just as, if not more, important than understanding where we are. It teaches us how the current situation has and might yet change over time.