3 ms·
Commercially, it totally did. Without Whatsapp we could not sell enough devices, but without enough volume Whatsapp was not interested to build an official app.
by fabrice_d 6y ago
Commercially, it totally did. Without Whatsapp we could not sell enough devices, but without enough volume Whatsapp was not interested to build an official app. Chicken, meet egg!
- toastal 6y agoI wonder what markets WhatsApp is important to. In the UK quite a few people used it while briefly lived there, but in the US, Thailand, Vietnam, et.al. I didn't see anyone using or ever talking about it.
- zem 6y agoit's huge in india. a phone that did not support it would definitely be a non-starter.
- abrowne 6y agoEuropean countries.
- FelipeCortez 6y agoIt is _the_ chat app in Brazil. Brazil is pretty big
- thaumasiotes 6y agoAdding on to the other comments, I understand it is the default messaging app in Australia / New Zealand. More roughly, my understanding of the messaging space was: - USA: Facebook Messenger - Japan, Taiwan: LINE - China: WeChat - Everywhere Else in the World: WhatsApp And the comments here seem to basically bear that out.
- zhte415 6y agoI find it curious a lot of friends are getting back to Skype, for personal use, across continents, and not CorporateSkype/OC. Is this a huge selection bias thing? Don't know. Several have also recently deleted GMail.
- Firehawke 6y agoI'm seeing a lot of push towards Discord in the USA as well; it's a bit awkward in that kind of usage, but when basically everyone is already using Discord on PC it's not hard to convince people to use the phone app.
- toastal 6y agoThailand is very much LINE and a close second is Messenger
- shp0ngle 6y agoIndia. I'm pretty sure they mean India.
- sobani 6y agoIn the Netherlands WhatsApp is so ubiquitous that it always surprises me to hear other countries are not 100% WA. (Besides China, for obvious reasons it doesn't surprise me China has their own app.) The only people I know who don't use WhatsApp are very privacy focused and therefor use Signal.
- toastal 6y agoThese answers have been insightful. Not sure why asking got me downvotes.
- mortenjorck 6y agoIf it was literally make-or-break for the entire platform, especially in the markets it was targeting, I’m surprised Mozilla never volunteered to subsidize or build a WhatsApp port.
- fabrice_d 6y agoWhy do you assume didn't try anything? We actually: - have been friendly to 3rd party clients developers, like Loquim (https://loqui.im/ https://loqui.im/). Once WA turned on e2e encryption, the situation for 3rd party clients changed from "difficult but fun" to "mostly impossible". - wrote a JVM in JS to run the S40 version of WA (https://github.com/mozilla/pluotsorbet https://github.com/mozilla/pluotsorbet). - partnered with a company specialized in bringing android apps to other OSes (they had Windows Phone support for instance).