Well that wasn't made clear. I was reacting to: > We'd just see people with no incentives continue down the road of poverty. Why would you reply to my commen

Well that wasn't made clear. I was reacting to: > We'd just see people with no incentives continue down the road of poverty. Why would you reply to my comment defending your stance as if I had challenged it? Why are you injecting yourself into that conversation if you're not supporting the claim that I explicitly referenced, and making it look like you're replying to the things I'm saying by quoting me directly?