3 ms·
When I tried it, it wasn't that good. The screens on the Q2 felt like a resolution of something between 720 and 1080p, which isn't that good compared to my dua
by novok 6y ago
When I tried it, it wasn't that good. The screens on the Q2 felt like a resolution of something between 720 and 1080p, which isn't that good compared to my dual 4k monitors. Same with a 8k & 6k 180 & 360 video.
Overall VR feels like it needs a 4x resolution bump. Basically a 16k 360 video rendering and 4k x 4k per eye vs the 1832x1920 per eye that the current q2 has. To do that well you probably need something like a two 3080 GPUs, one for each eye.
Even after that, maybe even an 8k x 8k would give a big improvement. We don't have GPUs that can render that today.
Foveated rendering is definitely needed for this to become possible.
- shpx 6y agoIf you have $4000 to spend, you can get the new Varjo VR-3. It has a 27° by 27° display with 71 pixels-per-degree resolution embedded in a 115° wide display at 30 PPD. 20/20 vision is ~60 PPD for ~210°. https://www.roadtovr.com/varjo-xr-3-vr-3-announcement-specs-release-date-price/ https://www.roadtovr.com/varjo-xr-3-vr-3-announcement-specs-...