3 ms·
> his should allow you to develop a nice little statically link executable instead of deploying a jar if needed. To save me the clone/compilation time, any app
by kodablah 6y ago
> his should allow you to develop a nice little statically link executable instead of deploying a jar if needed.
To save me the clone/compilation time, any approximate numbers of how small the binary is for a SWT app?
- fayten 6y agoA super simple test on Ubuntu I did back in November got me a 14mb executable consuming about 23mb of ram and about 38mb once the app was full screened. I'm pretty happy with the size considering the smallest runtime I can get with jlink around 40mb. I have also found GraalVM devs to be very responsive to issues on Github. I should note I am using Haxe here instead of pure Java, so a pure Java app might be a few kilobytes smaller. Screenshot: https://imgur.com/3otiHA2 https://imgur.com/3otiHA2