3 ms·
I'm pretty sure it's only street legal while the jet engine is turned off. Then you're just transporting a jet engine on the back of a Beetle, right?
by jey 6y ago
I'm pretty sure it's only street legal while the jet engine is turned off. Then you're just transporting a jet engine on the back of a Beetle, right?
- rococode 6y agoThat's what I thought too, but then the post says "That said, I do enjoy the occasional blast down the highway." and suddenly I'm not so sure...
- oedoedxef 6y agoI've also seen a mini-cooper on youtube with a jet in the back doing the same thing on the highway :)
- soperj 6y agoIt might be cool from an engineering perspective, but it's fucking stupid from a "there are other people on the road who's lives are now in danger" perspective.
- tempestn 6y agoI'm sure that's not legal, but then, neither are more conventional blasts down the highway.
- trhway 6y ago>the occasional blast down the highway if he were to install the engine into the vertical position, he could have enjoyed occasional blast _over_ highway as the thrust of this engine (even without adding turbofan) seems to be just about enough to lift a stripped down VW Beetle.
- 0_____0 6y agoi mean.... where's the law that says that it's _illegal_?
- extrapickles 6y agoNoise ordinances would be the easiest way it would be illegal, then hazard zone produced by the jet exhaust is not marked as that zone likely falls under same regulations as carrying a pole or other cargo that extends out back of the vehicle.