7 ms·
here you go: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rmiaquw3wnv3cvu/AACqp9bLXiDY5oCCUhrlzvSSa?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rmiaquw3wnv3cvu/AACqp9bLXiDY5oCCU... There ar
by mitjak 6y ago
here you go: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rmiaquw3wnv3cvu/AACqp9bLXiDY5oCCUhrlzvSSa?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/sh/rmiaquw3wnv3cvu/AACqp9bLXiDY5oCCU...
There are 16 bit TIFFs and JPEGs, along with a zoomed in crop (PNGs bc i wanted to have them be the same size for a side by side comparison). For the 2 scanners, these were scanned fully "raw", without any software colour correction or sharpening (FlexColor for the Imacon, Epson Scan 2 for the V600). The camera scan is using my 2012 Fuji X-E1 with a Micro-Nikkor 55mm @ f/8, and the V600 negative carrier, with an iPad as a light source (there's some barrel distortion; i'm still ironing out my rig). Final results corrected by my meatbag eye in Affinity (I had to increase saturation of the V600 scans to match the other two), hence the slightly different colour rendition, but the difference in grain resolution and overall detail should be pretty clear.
- KaiserPro 6y agothats really not half bad! considering that the imacon supposedly has a brilliant mount, to get that level of detail is quite impressive
- mitjak 6y agoright? this is a very janky rig too, with an inverted tripod and the negative holders sitting on top of drink coasters in my bedroom. I want to see what happens with blocking out ambient light, a better carrier, a brighter more uniform light source and maybe a full-frame camera body.