3 ms·

I consider them a scapegoat in the sense that they're sort of a catchall target for negative feelings about these problems. I also think they're not a scapegoat

I consider them a scapegoat in the sense that they're sort of a catchall target for negative feelings about these problems. I also think they're not a scapegoat insofar as they're responsible for their actual bad practices. It's not really either-or for me: they're blamed for things they really are responsible for, but I also think they catch a lot of flak in general for things that are largely beyond their control. I'd like them to be accountable for the bad things they actually do while keeping our eye on the broader problem, which I'm not as convinced as you are that everyone is doing already.

zepto 6y ago
Hmm, Honestly that doesn’t really clarify it for me. If the broader problem is: “network technologies encourage our tendencies toward runaway group think and villainization due to their effect of disinhibition” Then Facebook is by far the most significant manifestation of that, followed by YouTube and Twitter who are also criticized a great deal. What would it look like to address this broader problem without actually focussing on where it is manifest? I think I might be able to see more easily what you are getting at if you could give an example of something you see as beyond Facebook’s control, but for which they are catching flak?