10 ms·
I think for any commercial site, it's likely cheaper to use a platform like next or nuxt and a CDN rather than choking your build pipeline with static generatio
by tootie 6y ago
I think for any commercial site, it's likely cheaper to use a platform like next or nuxt and a CDN rather than choking your build pipeline with static generation. You still get static performance and just offload it to an edge network and CDN costs are racing downwards.
- thesandlord 6y agoNo need to do static generation at build time or fully server-side rendering with Next.js either, you can build static pages at runtime with ISR https://nextjs.org/blog/next-9-5#stable-incremental-static-regeneration https://nextjs.org/blog/next-9-5#stable-incremental-static-r... (edit: whoops this was for the parent comment)
- madeofpalk 6y ago"incremental static rendering" is... server-side rendering, at least that's what I meant. Rendering pages on demand for users as they request them, with (optional) invalidation to render it again later.