5 ms·

Thedonald.win Go learn what the other side thinks. Find common ground

mrtobo 6y ago
Whoa.
giantg2 6y ago
Probably better off finding a more legit/mainstream site if you want to find out what another side thinks. Using that site to find out what Republicans/Trump supporters believe on a wide scale would be like using the socialist party's website to find out what AOC supporters think (because people on the other side believe she's full socialist).
- JuliusPullo 6y ago
  There are no legit/mainstream sites anymore, there are too many powerful political interests in play. What tries to pass for "legit/mainstream" these days is plain old propaganda. Thedonald.win itself exists because the original group, r/The_Donald, was censored and banned from reddit on the excuse that they were inciting violence against the police. This, of course, happened just before inciting violence against the police was considered cool. If you want to know what that other side thinks (supposing you are on the other's other side), go to thedonald.win.
  - giantg2 6y ago
    I guess what I'm saying is that if you use a single site to stereotype a group of people, that stereotype will be wildly inaccurate. I'm sure there are Trump supporters (maybe better phrased as non-Biden supporters) that don't believe half the stuff on that site.
    - redflame8 6y ago
      There’s over 1 1/2 million people on that site it’s the largest forum of Trump supporters by far
      - giantg2 6y ago
        So 1.5M out of the 70M+ that voted for him...
        redflame8 6y ago
        Yes that is how math works. where do I find that portion of Biden supporters in one place?
        giantg2 6y ago
        "Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" Quit being a troll. Do you have a source for your 1.5 million claim? I could cite democraticunderground.com (260k) as a Biden supporting website. I guess I could stereotype all 70+M who voted for him as socialist terrorists because I see threads like "Do you ever dream of blowing up a trump building?". This sort of stereotyping based on a homogeneous sample of a fringe/clique website is wrong. Anyone with a basic understanding of statistics would know that taking a sample from a website like these would be biased.
        redflame8 6y ago
        Triggered.
- redflame8 6y ago
  R/politics isn’t full of people calling the President Drumpft while insisting its rude to mispronounce an uncommon derivation of kamala? It’s only OK to make fun of people if they’re orange but not if they’re black? Its never ok. I hate how many double standards the left makes for why they are exempt
Bakary 6y ago
What are some examples of common ground that you think deserve more attention?
- redflame8 6y ago
  That 99% of republicans aren't racist you just use the extremists to stereotype and use it as an excuse to espouse hate
  - dmarchand90 6y ago
    For a group of people who aren't racists they sure talk a lot about "riggers" and for people who don't espouse hate a lot of them really love their "Sunday gunday" and "helicopter rides"

Whoa.

Probably better off finding a more legit/mainstream site if you want to find out what another side thinks. Using that site to find out what Republicans/Trump supporters believe on a wide scale would be like using the socialist party's website to find out what AOC supporters think (because people on the other side believe she's full socialist).

JuliusPullo 6y ago
There are no legit/mainstream sites anymore, there are too many powerful political interests in play. What tries to pass for "legit/mainstream" these days is plain old propaganda. Thedonald.win itself exists because the original group, r/The_Donald, was censored and banned from reddit on the excuse that they were inciting violence against the police. This, of course, happened just before inciting violence against the police was considered cool. If you want to know what that other side thinks (supposing you are on the other's other side), go to thedonald.win.
- giantg2 6y ago
  I guess what I'm saying is that if you use a single site to stereotype a group of people, that stereotype will be wildly inaccurate. I'm sure there are Trump supporters (maybe better phrased as non-Biden supporters) that don't believe half the stuff on that site.
  - redflame8 6y ago
    There’s over 1 1/2 million people on that site it’s the largest forum of Trump supporters by far
    - giantg2 6y ago
      So 1.5M out of the 70M+ that voted for him...
      - redflame8 6y ago
        Yes that is how math works. where do I find that portion of Biden supporters in one place?
        giantg2 6y ago
        "Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" Quit being a troll. Do you have a source for your 1.5 million claim? I could cite democraticunderground.com (260k) as a Biden supporting website. I guess I could stereotype all 70+M who voted for him as socialist terrorists because I see threads like "Do you ever dream of blowing up a trump building?". This sort of stereotyping based on a homogeneous sample of a fringe/clique website is wrong. Anyone with a basic understanding of statistics would know that taking a sample from a website like these would be biased.
        redflame8 6y ago
        Triggered.
redflame8 6y ago
R/politics isn’t full of people calling the President Drumpft while insisting its rude to mispronounce an uncommon derivation of kamala? It’s only OK to make fun of people if they’re orange but not if they’re black? Its never ok. I hate how many double standards the left makes for why they are exempt

Bakary 6y ago

What are some examples of common ground that you think deserve more attention?

redflame8 6y ago
That 99% of republicans aren't racist you just use the extremists to stereotype and use it as an excuse to espouse hate
- dmarchand90 6y ago
  For a group of people who aren't racists they sure talk a lot about "riggers" and for people who don't espouse hate a lot of them really love their "Sunday gunday" and "helicopter rides"