3 ms·
I can't comment too much on the zero-G washing part (but I tend to agree), and I think the comment about solvent is actually very interesting. It's likely that
by hmwhy 6y ago
I can't comment too much on the zero-G washing part (but I tend to agree), and I think the comment about solvent is actually very interesting.
It's likely that weight is probably not the biggest concern if such a washing system were to be implemented, as they would probably design a system to recycle the washing liquid. I think most solvents that are candidates as washing liquids post either additional health and/or fire hazards in space.
In addition, and particularly for water-based washing, I think the error tolerance in engineering either (1) additional infrastructure to the existing water-recycling system and/or (2) a part that can confidently remove unwanted chemicals are challenging problems. the latter is probably the bigger concern because tolerance for error there would probably be substantially lower than urine recycling.
Just a guess because I thought it's an interesting comment, and it's quite possible that one can already design (if it doesn't already exist) a washing liquid that is safe for consumption at small quantities.
- imglorp 6y agoISS has a circulating ammonia system for its active cooling loops. Maybe there's a way to leverage that system if you can filter the laundry contaminants before returning to the loop. Also nobody's mentioned UV light. Odors are often due to bacteria and simply killing that stuff would go a long way to reusing garments without gagging on the odor.
- gambiting 6y agoAlso, I know people have done experiments where instead of washing, they have been freezing their clothes and that gets rid of the odour. And surely, freezing things on ISS should be trivial.
- NullPrefix 6y agoSo... Clotheslines between antennas?