4 ms·
While I know it is subjective, it is still my person pet-peeve. Abbreviations like DL and DMS are really hard to read and remember. What I would have used inste
by sheepfleece 6y ago
While I know it is subjective, it is still my person pet-peeve. Abbreviations like DL and DMS are really hard to read and remember. What I would have used instead is List and Map.
- js8 6y agoThat's fine. I like to use these because they are visually distinct identifiers (and short), List and Map look like the type (class) names. I know it's a different namespace, but still..
- pwm 6y agohlint rules are nice for enforcing this, eg. you put sg. like this in your .hlint.yaml: - modules: - { name: [Data.List], as: List } - { name: [Data.Map, Data.Map.Strict], as: Map } and then you get a hlint warning if you use DL/DMS instead of List/Map