Doesn’t that kind of defeat the point of chaos engineering, that is, making the process unsupervised and triggering failure scenarios that were not yet known?

Doesn’t that kind of defeat the point of chaos engineering, that is, making the process unsupervised and triggering failure scenarios that were not yet known? I always considered the simplest form of chaos engineering to be a process that randomly kills processes on a server, and see what happens. If, on the other hand, you mean that it’s important that the “chaos” aspects needs and on/off button and that someone needs to be managing that, then I agree. :)