2 ms·
It's quite CPU-intensive, but well worth watching if you can get it to work. I had to watch it in Chrome and bump my screen resolution down to 1024*768 to watc
by Auguste 15y ago
It's quite CPU-intensive, but well worth watching if you can get it to work. I had to watch it in Chrome and bump my screen resolution down to 1024*768 to watch it smoothly. It was well worth it.
- tga 15y agoI don't think that having to bump your screen resolution to get a website/video working is anywhere close to reasonable. The point was to replace Flash for web multimedia because it was too resource intensive and unstable. What we see now is a half-supported proof of concept growing out of unrelated technologies. This might be the beginning of something great, but WebGL still has miles to go before being viable mass consumption technology and it's important to recognize that.