3 ms·
It's because the GP is discrediting MacKenzie Bezos that he or she is being discredited in response. If GP is going to find fault with someone donating $4 billi
by spoonjim 6y ago
It's because the GP is discrediting MacKenzie Bezos that he or she is being discredited in response. If GP is going to find fault with someone donating $4 billion and ask "why not more," the question rightly comes back to "well what have you accomplished compared to her?"
- cute_boi 6y agoThe issue is GP has made sacrifice but MacKenzie doesn't have to scarify as much as GP. GP am not saying MacKenzie have to make sacrifice but he is just pointing the fact we live in society where richest people hoards money instead of using it for betterment society. And most of the donations are just plain PR strategy or some tax escape strategy. You may argue they earned hard for that money but some people are just lucky and don't have to struggle and are so greedy they don't care about anyone else.
- jrs235 6y agoThe Commentary is quite interesting here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesson_of_the_widow%27s_mite https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesson_of_the_widow%27s_mite