2 ms·
This seems very unlikely to me. Not only would the attacker need to know precise detail about the exact methods and steps taken by a russia-sponsored group, th
by naikrovek 6y ago
This seems very unlikely to me. Not only would the attacker need to know precise detail about the exact methods and steps taken by a russia-sponsored group, the attacker would also need to entirely suppress their own methods and approaches so that they are not identifiable as themselves.
Much easier to simply hide who you are by changing your compromise fingerprint than to try to impersonate someone else's compromise fingerprint.
If a technique is seen in this attack that has been seen in previous attacks which are now known to be by a russia-sponsored group, that is very strong evidence that the same group is responsible. It is not proof, but it is strong evidence.
- sudosysgen 6y agoIf you know what the investigators are looking for (say, after you hacked them), then it might not be that hard. Given the fact that attribution is so difficult that we haven't seen any lawsuits yet, I'd imagine that entirlely suppressing your own methods if you know what the investigator is expecting from someone else as well as what the methods of others are is feasible.