2 ms·
Youtube and Facebook get away with it because they're not primarily porn sites; they're social networking and the vast majority of users use it for normal non-p
by gamblor956 6y ago
Youtube and Facebook get away with it because they're not primarily porn sites; they're social networking and the vast majority of users use it for normal non-porn purposes. Moreover, while they had vast quantities of porn, they're also huge sites and most of their users don't use the site for porn.
PornHub is just porn. And they've been on notice for years that CP and non-consensual videos are being uploaded to their system yet don't very little to stop it. They claim that they have filters and other systems in place to stop illegal uploads, but those systems are so useless that PH claimed they had 0 illegal porn on their website, when that was demonstrably false prior to them removing all unverified user-uploaded content.
- dragonwriter 6y agoPersonally, I think it's a problem that a social networking or video sharing site that isn't a porn site has vastly more child and other non-consensual porn than slips by at the world’s largest dedicated porn network of sites. The only reason I can see for not be concerned more about the former than the latter is that the concern about CP/non-consent is feigned and the real concern is about legitimate porn, with the CP/non-consent as merely convenient pretext. Which is also consistent with those concerns becoming more shrill when the porn site takes drastic action to deal with the problem which removes the pretext.
- buisi 6y agoWhere did they say they have absolutely zero illegal porn?