3 ms·
Some people spent hours in No Man's Sky too. The cost per hour only matters if you can put up with 'flaws'. Most expected the latest and greatest, what they go
by friendlybus 6y ago
Some people spent hours in No Man's Sky too. The cost per hour only matters if you can put up with 'flaws'.
Most expected the latest and greatest, what they got was not that. Every hype/drop cycle is the same, but this cycle is filled with more valid complaints than normal, depressingly.
People felt burnt on Oblivion in 2013 because it was boring green forests and unappealing face design. That game pretty much worked for hundreds of hours of content. Cyberpunk can't even get the basic mechanics right.
- no_one_ever 6y agoOblivion was released way earlier than 2013 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elder_Scrolls_IV:_Oblivion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elder_Scrolls_IV:_Oblivion
- Kiro 6y agoAre you saying No Man's Sky is a bad game? It's the greatest comeback the gaming world has ever seen. I've clocked hundreds of hours by now. Absolutely amazing game.
- friendlybus 6y agoWhen it came out it was a pointless and mostly buggy grind-a-thon. Some played it to 'chill out and relax' and could have argued the $/hr was a positive ratio when 99.95% of people did not share that experience. I haven't played it since launch, it made for a good internet historian video!
- Kiro 6y agoAh, I misunderstood. Sorry! I agree. I played it a few hours on launch at a friend's place and it was completely underwhelming.