3 ms·
They are doing that already. When Trump kept claiming that they wouldn't let the observers see the signatures, he was neglecting to also point out that the sign
by ksaj 6y ago
They are doing that already. When Trump kept claiming that they wouldn't let the observers see the signatures, he was neglecting to also point out that the signatures are compared electronically, and only failed signatures are reviewed by a human before getting rejected altogether. This is partly why the court dismissed this particular claim.
- tmaly 6y agoDo you have some references to this and to the process used? I was not aware that signatures are compared electronically.
- ksaj 6y agoHere's an article about one of the solutions: https://na.panasonic.com/us/trends/confronting-votings-new-normal-ballot-scanning-and-signature-verification-technology https://na.panasonic.com/us/trends/confronting-votings-new-n... Basically they compare the ballot signature with the one used on your license. Not everybody has a license, so I'm guessing there is more to it than just that. Probably something in regards to the voter registration itself. Also - in the video that RG cites as proof that they counted some ballots more than once, I believe they are actually re-scanning signatures. The machine in the video pretty much looks exactly like the one this article refers to.