Talking about the limits of how we use technology in society is hardly disempowering - quite the opposite. I would have thought that talking less about the pote

Talking about the limits of how we use technology in society is hardly disempowering - quite the opposite. I would have thought that talking less about the potential supremacy of technology would be the real counterproductive measure in trying to curb that potential reality. Whether or not the influence of technology is overblown, the fact still stands that we need to draw boundaries around how technology can be used for persuasion. The question should be "where is the line?" not "should we even bother drawing one?".