3 ms·
So they knew that Westlaw data was there, but only asked for headnotes and footnotes and other 'noise' to be removed, not for the Westlaw data as a whole to be
by ghusbands 6y ago
So they knew that Westlaw data was there, but only asked for headnotes and footnotes and other 'noise' to be removed, not for the Westlaw data as a whole to be removed. That supports the lawsuit.
- antiterra 6y agoWestlaw’s individual bits of core content are largely not owned by Westlaw and unprotected by its copyrights. It should be possible to carefully extract that in a manner that does not violate copyright law.
- asimilator 6y agoFor cases, I would think headnotes and footnotes would be the only proprietary Westlaw data. The case itself is content written by the court.