4 ms·
I think the basic argument is "use a one-time pad" but it assumes that an unencrypted but unique email account meets the same requirements as a cryptographic on
by smhinsey 15y ago
I think the basic argument is "use a one-time pad" but it assumes that an unencrypted but unique email account meets the same requirements as a cryptographic one-time pad, which I don't think I agree with.
That being said, I probably wouldn't use encryption anyway. I wouldn't do anything that might cause my correspondence to receive any further scrutiny whatsoever.
- maqr 15y agoYou use encryption every day already, you just don't think about it. For all of HTTPS's faults, it's so transparent that you don't even think of it as encrypted communication. If PKI apps and MUAs didn't suck so much, we'd probably all treat email the same way.
- smhinsey 15y agoI would definitely use HTTPS, but that's not really what I had in mind. When I said I wouldn't use encryption I was thinking specifically about PKI stuff like PGP, precisely because like you say, it sucks to use it. Badly enough that I think it would make you stick out and receive additional scrutiny if you did.