> This doesn't matter. Maybe I expressed myself a bit too literally, but I wouldn't say that how LLVM handles UB "doesn't matter." Look at how Clang compiles u

> This doesn't matter. Maybe I expressed myself a bit too literally, but I wouldn't say that how LLVM handles UB "doesn't matter." Look at how Clang compiles undefined behavior vs GCC (for example)[1]. A bit tautological, but different ways of handling UB can lead to different ways UB behaves. > LLVM IR is not C, and it is not convertible to C... This isn't strictly true. There used to be an "official" C(pp) backend, which has been recently resurrected[2]. You can definitely go from LLVM to C -- probably won't be very readable, though. [1] https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2011-05-21-what-every-c-programmer-should-know_21/ https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2011-05-21-what-every-c-programm... [2] https://github.com/JuliaComputing/llvm-cbe https://github.com/JuliaComputing/llvm-cbe