3 ms·
Are you sure that doesn't imply Facebook is being more diligent about catching it. Or the samples on facebook are easier to screen for?
by therealdrag0 6y ago
Are you sure that doesn't imply Facebook is being more diligent about catching it. Or the samples on facebook are easier to screen for?
- PunchTornado 6y agoit was done by a third party organisation
- therealdrag0 6y agoNicholas Kristof writes: > The Internet Watch Foundation couldn’t explain why its figure for Pornhub is so low. Perhaps it’s because people on Pornhub are inured to the material and unlikely to report it. But if you know what to look for, it’s possible to find hundreds of apparent child sexual abuse videos on Pornhub in 30 minutes. Pornhub has recently offered playlists with names including “less than 18,” “the best collection of young boys” and “under- - age.” Is there any information that IWF has done more sophisticated audit than relying on user reports? Have they used advanced "fuzzy" searching algorithms that Facebook uses to identify known videos that have been modified in some way to get past filters?