3 ms·
What you're effectively saying - just like all arguments of this form, which seems to be quite popular lately - is that ordinary people should not be able to sh
by makomk 6y ago
What you're effectively saying - just like all arguments of this form, which seems to be quite popular lately - is that ordinary people should not be able to share their own content that they create online, because it's too hard to 100% police everything that they do. (Presumably including sending things directly and privately to people that they know, given how much better a channel that is for child porn than somewhere like Pornhub.) That the internet should be a consume-only place for the output of big corporate content factories whose content can be verified. Except framed in such a way as to make this seem like an anti-corporate stance, rather than the massive pro-corporate grab it is.