5 ms·

Regardless of the irregularities or errors, which are arguably bound to happen, and do happen every election, the question is whether there was enough errors/ta

by arberx 6y ago

Regardless of the irregularities or errors, which are arguably bound to happen, and do happen every election, the question is whether there was enough errors/tampering/irregularities to constitute fraud that would overturn the result. Further, this report highlights one voting system in a couple counties in a battle ground state. A study that would answer the question above, would look at a representative number of counties in every state. Why are we focusing on these states?

arberx 6y ago
One thing to also note, this law firm is heavily biased looking at their homepage: https://www.depernolaw.com/ https://www.depernolaw.com/
salawat 6y ago
Because those have the highest impact as swing states, and with a 68% alleged error rate, and lack of adjudication logs, in a traceability critical system, which shows significantly altered behavior from previous year's datasets, this is highly alarming from the process integrity point of view. There needs to ne a widening of the net to any other county using the same or a similar system. Eventual winner be damned. The process is what matters, and the integrity based on this report is grossly threatened. Nice of this to only pop up today, and there's a lot of knock-on investigations that'd have to take place as a result to ascertain things. I was vetting the Epoch Times story for credibility, and was looking for whether or not there is an official place if record to lookup the document signed off on by 13th Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer. Anyone got an idea where that could be looked up? I'd not normally go this far to verify, but the consequences are far reaching enough where I'm going all the way back to the official record if at all possible.
- arberx 6y ago
  You can't rule out error in other counties/states, as they simply haven't been looked at. I'm 100% sure you'll find irregularities in other states/counties as well.
- salawat 6y ago
  I'm on maximum paranoia on this one, so I'm still looking for some more confirmation given that apparently this court does not use https for their site. http://www.13thcircuitcourt.org/2393/Bailey-v-Antrim-County-2020009238CZ http://www.13thcircuitcourt.org/2393/Bailey-v-Antrim-County-... Any Michiganders among us to vouch for authenticity?
  - salawat 6y ago
    Site seems to check out. State of Michigan's Judiciary staff directory points to it, and the domain has been established since 2009, with regular development and a consistent roster of Judges lining up with other sources. Aside from the horrid lack off https and a .org domain instead of .gov, it seems to check out.

by arberx 6y ago

arberx 6y ago

One thing to also note, this law firm is heavily biased looking at their homepage: https://www.depernolaw.com/ https://www.depernolaw.com/

salawat 6y ago

Because those have the highest impact as swing states, and with a 68% alleged error rate, and lack of adjudication logs, in a traceability critical system, which shows significantly altered behavior from previous year's datasets, this is highly alarming from the process integrity point of view. There needs to ne a widening of the net to any other county using the same or a similar system. Eventual winner be damned. The process is what matters, and the integrity based on this report is grossly threatened. Nice of this to only pop up today, and there's a lot of knock-on investigations that'd have to take place as a result to ascertain things. I was vetting the Epoch Times story for credibility, and was looking for whether or not there is an official place if record to lookup the document signed off on by 13th Circuit Judge Kevin Elsenheimer. Anyone got an idea where that could be looked up? I'd not normally go this far to verify, but the consequences are far reaching enough where I'm going all the way back to the official record if at all possible.

arberx 6y ago
You can't rule out error in other counties/states, as they simply haven't been looked at. I'm 100% sure you'll find irregularities in other states/counties as well.
salawat 6y ago
I'm on maximum paranoia on this one, so I'm still looking for some more confirmation given that apparently this court does not use https for their site. http://www.13thcircuitcourt.org/2393/Bailey-v-Antrim-County-2020009238CZ http://www.13thcircuitcourt.org/2393/Bailey-v-Antrim-County-... Any Michiganders among us to vouch for authenticity?
- salawat 6y ago
  Site seems to check out. State of Michigan's Judiciary staff directory points to it, and the domain has been established since 2009, with regular development and a consistent roster of Judges lining up with other sources. Aside from the horrid lack off https and a .org domain instead of .gov, it seems to check out.