3 ms·
Why do you consider it a hit piece? The main allegation that illegal content was on PornHub is based on facts, right?
by Bootvis 6y ago
Why do you consider it a hit piece? The main allegation that illegal content was on PornHub is based on facts, right?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- miracle2k 6y agoIllegal content is on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit. The question is if and when it is removed. There are people accusing all of those sites of irresponsibility when it comes to moderating. But roughly, there seems to be no strong evidence that Pornhub did not remove illegal content they became aware of. More generally, the question is if a porn-site that allows anyone to upload stuff should be legally viable. You may feel that it should not. But make no mistake, Laila Mickelwait wants to shutdown the porn industry, not improve Pornhub.
- Raphmedia 6y ago> But roughly, there seems to be no strong evidence that Pornhub did not remove illegal content they became aware of. There seem to be no strong evidence that Pornhub did remove illegal content they became aware of.
- twblalock 6y ago> But roughly, there seems to be no strong evidence that Pornhub did not remove illegal content they became aware of. It's delusional to think that Pornhub did not know about this content. They only cared when the credit card companies threatened to withhold payments.
- totony 6y agoThis is clearly false, they've claimed to be using a lot of technologies to preventively detect these issues. Visa has threatened to destroy not only Pornhub, but the whole parent company now. They'll just shut down Pornhub before destroying their company. Looking forward to the next russian-hosted site. It will surely be better, right?
- twblalock 6y ago> This is clearly false, they've claimed to be using a lot of technologies to preventively detect these issues. Either the technology didn't work, or the claims were false. Either way, Pornhub knew that they were hosting these videos. They just didn't care.