4 ms·
I'd rather the BBC responsibly report that there was "nothing to suggest" it caused worse disease or that vaccines would no longer work, to any alternative. Fa
by dfxm12 6y ago
I'd rather the BBC responsibly report that there was "nothing to suggest" it caused worse disease or that vaccines would no longer work, to any alternative.
Facts will get out. You say "the media" as if each outlet is the same, but that's not the case - both responsible sources and conspiracy theorists (among other types of reporters) are represented among "the media". If you want people to have a better understanding of this, it's better that responsible sources get ahead of misinformation.
- standardUser 6y agoMaybe we should start calling it the "clickbait media". I do see the BBC as a different type of news outlet that generally plays it straight, and the wording of this particular article sounds very responsible to me. But much of the rest of the media will have a field day with this.
- 52-6F-62 6y ago> But much of the rest of the media will have a field day with this. Until that happens, isn't blanket-labelling them a guilty party a little premature?