Not only was he not wrong, his solution even addresses disagreements about whether the gap still exists. You say the remaining gap is a 'motherhood' gap. Someo

Not only was he not wrong, his solution even addresses disagreements about whether the gap still exists. You say the remaining gap is a 'motherhood' gap. Someone else thinks its chauvinism. And someone else thinks it's feminist propaganda. And another thinks it's a Masonic scheme. It doesn't matter! The market will correct for whatever injustice might actually exist. But only if the law permits the market to enact a price for bigotry.