3 ms·
People would probably argue a “multi cloud” solution. Have your infrastructure be “cloud agnostic” and this sort of problem would be avoided. There was actuall
by xyst 6y ago
People would probably argue a “multi cloud” solution. Have your infrastructure be “cloud agnostic” and this sort of problem would be avoided.
There was actually a project called “spinnaker” that was supposed to solve this problem.
Whether the cost of paying 2 or more cloud providers is worth it for most companies is up in the air.
- papito 6y ago"Multi-cloud" only works if you stick with the basics. Like disk storage, compute, and a well-supported database. Once you tie in into a cloud's specific offerings.....
- __s 6y agoIt's getting convoluted now that cloud providers seem to realize there's demand for this https://aws.amazon.com/hybrid https://aws.amazon.com/hybrid https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/azure-arc https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/azure-arc https://cloud.google.com/anthos https://cloud.google.com/anthos Full disclosure: I work for Azure. Don't work on Arc tho. Don't have experience being a customer for these products
- robertlagrant 6y agoI find the Anthos docs and talks so confusing. Half of them say Anthos is for hybrid between on-prem and GCP. The other half say it's for multicloud and hybrid.