4 ms·
> Zig is a lot more complex than C Well if you include preprocessor, make, and cmake (which I think is basically standard now), the level of complexity feels "
by dnautics 6y ago
> Zig is a lot more complex than C
Well if you include preprocessor, make, and cmake (which I think is basically standard now), the level of complexity feels "close to parity".
- MaxBarraclough 6y agoIncluding CMake is downright unsporting ;-P
- dnautics 6y agoMost modern professional C projects do use it. You kind of can't get away.
- MaxBarraclough 6y agoWe're agreed. I use it for my personal C++ projects. It's really quite awful (I've ranted about it on HN more than once [0][1]) but it's still the least bad choice. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24203172 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24203172 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24565266 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24565266