> Seems like he doesn't make money off of wannabees but rather the successful ones, no? Depends on your definition of success. Founding a business that operate

> Seems like he doesn't make money off of wannabees but rather the successful ones, no? Depends on your definition of success. Founding a business that operates at loss but is subsidized in a false economy of other businesses doing the exact same thing is not a good definition of mine, and that's the vast majority of bay area startups. > What was the turning point for you? I've always found him to be an anti-intellectual, like much of modern tech.