Hi HN, Here's a little background about gistpoint, I was an FPGA developer working on DSP systems at a big company in D.C. Last May, bored of my job and frustr

Hi HN, Here's a little background about gistpoint, I was an FPGA developer working on DSP systems at a big company in D.C. Last May, bored of my job and frustrated at my career progress, I took the paths most travelled and quit my job to wander around the world. Along the way, I picked up ruby/rails and javascript because I want to transition into web programming. The learning curve was steep coming from the hardware world. Plus running from city to city also made it tough to maintain focus. 2 months ago, after many false starts and months of distraction, I finally decided to push it through completion. gistpoint is a web app that lets you search and submit summaries for online articles. It's unique in that it has a scorer that rates how relevant a summary is compared to its fulltext. This is done by analyzing several factors such as information coverage, sentence grammar, word stemming, etc. So the best summary will rise to the top and gets shown as the default. No signup/login is needed to submit summaries, and quality is controlled without voting. When no user-submitted summary is available, it will extract the most relevant passage from the fulltext. From my experience if I just naturally summarize an article I just read, the scorer rates it highly compared to the extracted one. Please let me know what you think. If anyone wants to know more about the scoring algorithm, I'll be happy to write a post about it. I definitely open source the summary extraction and grammar gems on github. They're already on rubygems https://rubygems.org/profiles/50055 https://rubygems.org/profiles/50055 for you to download, I just need to create the documentations.