3 ms·
> used as one of the essential thinkers in the legal teaching It is ironic that you link to an article that defines Schmitt as one of the main architects behin
by stareatgoats 6y ago
> used as one of the essential thinkers in the legal teaching
It is ironic that you link to an article that defines Schmitt as one of the main architects behind Nazi political theory. Then again, irony seems to be in vogue these days.
The article admittedly goes on to find some "prescience" in Schmitts thinking but the purpose of the piece is above all to reveal and attach a brown aspect to the Brexit movement, nothing else.
Wikipedia says it more clearly [0]: "Schmitt joined the Nazi Party on 1 May 1933. Within days, he supported the party in the burning of books by Jewish authors, rejoiced in the burning of 'un-German' and 'anti-German' material, and called for a much more extensive purge, to include works by authors influenced by Jewish ideas. In July Hermann Göring appointed him State Councillor for Prussia, and in November he became the president of the 'Union of National-Socialist Jurists'.(...) He presented his theories as an ideological foundation of the Nazi dictatorship and a justification of the Führer state concerning legal philosophy, particularly through the concept of auctoritas."
and
"In 1945, American forces captured Schmitt and, after spending more than a year in an internment camp, he returned to his home town (...) . He remained unrepentant for his role in the creation of the Nazi state, and refused every attempt at de-nazification, which barred him from academic jobs."
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Schmitt
- BlueTemplar 6y agoYes, but you haven't answered my question. Is he or not considered as an essential thinker in the political/legal domains (in the sense that he is mandatory teaching in some professions)?
- stareatgoats 6y agoIn the case he be "an essential thinker" you can rest assured that he is so mainly for his role in justifying the leader-cult of Nazi-Germany, just as Hitler might be mentioned as an "essential leader" in history. But since "essential" as a standalone adjective has positive connotations it is misleading to say the least to leave out the "Nazi" adverb when describing either gentleman, i.e. they are both primarily essential Nazi thinkers/leaders. He is a topic in academia in all essence since he is an academic and an essential Nazi, and has produced literature (even pre-1933, with clear autocratic leanings) and has drawn conclusions that is of interest in a "survey of the landscape" type of inquiry [0]. Finally he continues to be of seeming essentiality because he continues to be propped up by Nazis and their ilk (like this Yarvin figure). [0] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schmitt/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/schmitt/