The title shows a huge lack of understanding of how human knowledge works. Never was "everything wrong" with contemporary theories on any field. If existing (ap

The title shows a huge lack of understanding of how human knowledge works. Never was "everything wrong" with contemporary theories on any field. If existing (applied) theories were 100% wrong then people wouldn't use them at all. New theories (even groundbreaking ones) usually build upon previous ones and/or become a more complete version of them, a superset. Thinking one can erase 300 years of thought on a field is veeery small minded.