5 ms·
The property being destroyed belongs to people, so you don't have any basis to claim that burning cars and stores doesn't cause "psychological harm, maldevelopm
by dx87 6y ago
The property being destroyed belongs to people, so you don't have any basis to claim that burning cars and stores doesn't cause "psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation".
- sudosysgen 6y agoIn case where it clearly did, especially if done so on purpose, maybe you could call it violent. Do you think smashing the wares of a company did, or breaking insured store windows qualifies?
- zepto 6y agoYes - the ‘corporation’ or shareholders may not be affected, but local employees who are responsible for those things can easily be harmed.
- sudosysgen 6y agoWell, in this case it's the local employees doing it, isn't it?
- zepto 6y agoNot all of them, wouldn’t you agree?
- anigbrowl 6y agoApparently, people who saw fit to steal money from the people working for them. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.