3 ms·

If YouTube is a public resource, why wouldn't the laws governing public nudity apply? I can see image stills of naked women without requiring an age consent res

If YouTube is a public resource, why wouldn't the laws governing public nudity apply? I can see image stills of naked women without requiring an age consent restriction. Look, one video even entices women to shave their vaginas. And is it "Education" if she holds up a dildo since the search term is showing sexual bias towards women?

dragonwriter 6y ago
> If YouTube is a public resource, why wouldn't the laws governing public nudity apply? Because those laws by their own terms usually apply to people being nude in public places, not to images (whether in public or on publicly accessible websites), which are governed by different laws.
- the_dark_won 6y ago
  This is digital public nudity. There is no rationalization you can use for indecent exposure. Wait until these links go on BiTly and get posted all around the internet anonymously! I mean heck, why can't we just live in a society where everyone walks around naked? Clothes are unreasonably expensive these days! "Big Clothing" is such an abomination dating back to the times of Adam and Eve!
  - dragonwriter 6y ago
    > This is digital public nudity. “Digital public nudity” isn't an actual legal thing. > There is no rationalization you can use for indecent exposure. Point to an indecent exposure law which covers this. > Wait until these links go on BiTly and get posted all around the internet anonymously! And...what catastrophe am I supposed to be anticipating? > I mean heck, why can't we just live in a society where everyone walks around naked? We can, if we choose (see, “naturism”), but I don't see what that has to do with pictures (moving or not) on the internet.
    - the_dark_won 6y ago
      > “Digital public nudity” isn't an actual legal thing. Yet > And...what catastrophe am I supposed to be anticipating? The digital form of public flashing > We can, if we choose (see, “naturism”), but I don't see what that has to do with pictures (moving or not) on the internet. I was being facetious. But seriously, can you set the example starting tomorrow since you clearly don't have an issue with this?

dragonwriter 6y ago

> If YouTube is a public resource, why wouldn't the laws governing public nudity apply? Because those laws by their own terms usually apply to people being nude in public places, not to images (whether in public or on publicly accessible websites), which are governed by different laws.

the_dark_won 6y ago
This is digital public nudity. There is no rationalization you can use for indecent exposure. Wait until these links go on BiTly and get posted all around the internet anonymously! I mean heck, why can't we just live in a society where everyone walks around naked? Clothes are unreasonably expensive these days! "Big Clothing" is such an abomination dating back to the times of Adam and Eve!
- dragonwriter 6y ago
  > This is digital public nudity. “Digital public nudity” isn't an actual legal thing. > There is no rationalization you can use for indecent exposure. Point to an indecent exposure law which covers this. > Wait until these links go on BiTly and get posted all around the internet anonymously! And...what catastrophe am I supposed to be anticipating? > I mean heck, why can't we just live in a society where everyone walks around naked? We can, if we choose (see, “naturism”), but I don't see what that has to do with pictures (moving or not) on the internet.
  - the_dark_won 6y ago
    > “Digital public nudity” isn't an actual legal thing. Yet > And...what catastrophe am I supposed to be anticipating? The digital form of public flashing > We can, if we choose (see, “naturism”), but I don't see what that has to do with pictures (moving or not) on the internet. I was being facetious. But seriously, can you set the example starting tomorrow since you clearly don't have an issue with this?