I'm pretty sure the ruling is saying that due to how the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is worded, suing individual agents of the government qualifies as red

I'm pretty sure the ruling is saying that due to how the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is worded, suing individual agents of the government qualifies as redress against the government; The RFRA more specifically defines what 'the government' means to include agents of the government acting in their individual capacities. > (a) RFRA’s text provides that persons may sue and “obtain appro-priate relief against a government,” 42 U. S. C. §2000bb–1(c), includ-ing an “official (or other person acting under color of law) of the United States,” §2000bb–2(1). [1] [1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-71_qol1.pdf https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-71_qol1.pdf