4 ms·

I too came back here to say "Interesting take". I didn't get to read enough of it so I hope to get back and comment on it later. That said, it feels a bit too d

I too came back here to say "Interesting take". I didn't get to read enough of it so I hope to get back and comment on it later. That said, it feels a bit too daunting that I don't see a menu tree only links leading to yet another page. I feel lost. I'd love to have a map of the territory to be able to size it up. Currently I have no idea if this is 50 pages or 500 pages. All right the sitemap says 127 pages.

eyelidlessness 6y ago
It seems like they frontloaded the risk of poor navigation to get launched /s. In all seriousness I’m curious about the proposition but after diving several pages deep in their page hierarchy I don’t know what they’re trying to assert/promote even as a vague philosophy and I’m not sure whether it’s worth my time. But if it’s still compelling after you get further in I’m open to persuasion.
- ineedasername 6y ago
  Yes, a few pages deep and I still don't know where the rubber meets the road on this besides some generalities about risk and starting projects with it's analysis. As a stand alone concept I suppose that's fine, but as a software development method I need something more than that without having to dig through an oddly structured set of pages.