> Before stuff goes to CentOS Stream it has passed RHEL QA and CI. Do we have an official word on that? Because it feels like QA could just as easily be priori

> Before stuff goes to CentOS Stream it has passed RHEL QA and CI. Do we have an official word on that? Because it feels like QA could just as easily be priority tasked on the next point release RHEL and starve stream of QA while it carries on ahead. I guess this boils down to the workflow which there doesnt seem to be a simple guide of with this news. And no, I wouldn't agree that they just swapped places. CentOS stream is a rolling release. Unless I am mistaken that's not how RHEL is built right now. I can see a reason for swapping them in that adding RHEL goodies/licencing into the free version is easier than removing, but the release cycle change, dropping CentOS 8 and as you admit, absolutely shambolic official press release, with lines that reek of a salesperson trying to squeeze out a bonus, do not inspire faith.