2 ms·
At 150 dpi the image depth is not a problem. Here is the 4-bit image of the 1929 Bentley as displayed on the frame for reference: https://www.instagram.com/p/CI
by clash 6y ago
At 150 dpi the image depth is not a problem. Here is the 4-bit image of the 1929 Bentley as displayed on the frame for reference: https://www.instagram.com/p/CItoGRLh52n/ https://www.instagram.com/p/CItoGRLh52n/
On the device you only notice if you get extremely close.
- baybal2 6y agoNote, they have dithering, and they likely went for the best one possible.
- clash 6y agoThey == the ArtFrame's built-in software ;) What I posted was generated by the device. It is an example of the actual picture quality.
- tertius 6y agoYes, with a specifically chosen image.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- cookingmyserver 6y agoInteresting accusation. What attributes of this photo would lend itself to be of better quality in such a display?
- ISL 6y ago(Disclaimer: I think this display is awesome -- can't allocate the funds for it right now, but will be keeping an eye on it going forward.) The image is "contrasty", showing lots of hard transitions from bright to dark. With displays of low bit-depth, the hard thing to do is smooth gradients of tonality.
- ekianjo 6y agoLooks like you (cherry?) picked an image with exceptionally good contrast.