4 ms·
It's awkward that the author feels they can't morally post an example, because it's impossible to judge the claims when only the least-strong evidence is presen
by sp332 6y ago
It's awkward that the author feels they can't morally post an example, because it's impossible to judge the claims when only the least-strong evidence is presented.
- davej 6y agoFor anybody that is curious [very NSFW] https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=naked+yoga https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=naked+yoga
- iaHN 6y agoIs there a way to view videos deemed nsfw without signing into a google/youtube account?
- danillonunes 6y agoThere's a site that you can use by adding nsfw in the front of the YouTube domain (so you get nsfwyoutube.com), but last time I tried it didn't worked. Not sure if it was a temporary issue or if YT is blocking them.
- chillwaves 6y agoYoutube has stepped up their game wrt to age restricted videos. You are now forced to watch them on youtube. Previously could get around it using the /embed/ url or third party sites like youtuberepeater. Seems like these methods have been closed. > It's using technology to identify age-restrictive content so that when viewers discover age-restricted videos embedded on most third-party websites, they will now be required to log in to watch those videos in order to verify their age. https://www.axios.com/youtube-age-restrictions-children-91db71e5-390d-4f07-9ebf-3e74efe19a3a.html https://www.axios.com/youtube-age-restrictions-children-91db...
- tyu2 6y agoyoutube-dl works
- politelemon 6y agoUse NewPipe
- tomjen3 6y agoIf you have VLC installed you can copy the address and then past it into VLC then select the play option. It works most of the time, and worked with the first video I tried. You can also enqueue them, if you want to play more back to back. I normally use it in conjunction with the RSS feed of channels.
- dizzystar 6y agoThe author tells you how to find things. The thumbnails are more Rated-X than I anticipated, and I wouldn't want to link to any of those videos either.
- claudiawerner 6y agoThis is, in my observation and that of a few others, a serious problem in journalism and serious scholarly work - in which we debate the morality and meaning of materials without showing examples for the reader to make up their own mind, and sometimes even lacking in a description. However, it's understandable too - some material may not only be too unsavory for the content carrier/publisher, but it may even be illegal in where the content is sold. A scholar working in Japanese Studies on the topic of media and sex was stopped at the Canadian border and interrogated when a search threw up documents containing the word 'rape' on his laptop. Activists, however, may have more leeway. Documentaries on animal cruelty and slideshows from anti-porn activists (to name two examples I'm familiar with) are much less hesitant - their goal is to rouse emotions and face-value judgements, so long as the viewer is primed to interpret the materials in the desired way.