4 ms·
I'm quite impressed by that “chromeisbad” as a domain was not already taken.
by Blikkentrekker 6y ago
I'm quite impressed by that “chromeisbad” as a domain was not already taken.
- codetrotter 6y agoYeah. After reading your comment I tried out a couple of similar domains on the form x is bad and x is good and they were both parked waiting for someone to pay whatever ridiculous price the owner is wanting to demand to sell it. I wish it was illegal to do that.
- Blikkentrekker 6y agoIf it weren't legal, then someone would simply use it for a trivial website and then sell it. Perhaps that is the only reason this simple, trivial article exists.
- throw0101a 6y agoSomewhat related: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Motors_v._Nissan_Computer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Motors_v._Nissan_Comput... * https://www.thedrive.com/news/35179/the-man-who-fought-nissan-over-a-website-and-won-has-died-of-covid-19 https://www.thedrive.com/news/35179/the-man-who-fought-nissa...
- libria 6y agoWith the amount of rebuttals in this thread, I'm impressed `chromeisgood.com` isn't taken.
- artiszt 6y agoright besides, most probably would learn themselves the hard way when put in the same position the OP detailed problems with Goo are widely known in circles of the Mac-communities ever since Goo-acc's first became avail in the beginning only by invitation, back then also worth to look into the history of why, when and by whom LS aka LittleSnitch was developed in the first place -- tho this was more related to issues with that then must-go-to site 'versiontracker' [for all sorts of Mac shareware] and a vintaged firewall [3rd party] product widely used that time that didn't work as advertised a Mac OS w/out LS these days ? back then very few only were concerned with 'calling-/phoning-home' issues on a scale nobody could imagine, least speak or post about in public, in those pre-iPhone ages
- alfon 6y agoHere you have another one: ilovechrome.com :)