3 ms·
Many years ago, I fondly used and documented the free and open Red Hat distribution, which ended with release 9 in 2003. I still have a hard drive with the orig
by chasil 6y ago
Many years ago, I fondly used and documented the free and open Red Hat distribution, which ended with release 9 in 2003. I still have a hard drive with the original Red Hat 6 based on System V init, not the later v6 based on Upstart.
There was a great feeling of abandonment then that is nostalgic in the death of CentOS now.
In the years that have passed, I saw a few licenses purchased in my workplace, then support suddenly stopped by corporate sources who instructed all license holders to convert our installs to Oracle Linux support.
I remembered my feeling of abandonment by Red Hat, ran the script without complaint, and all was well.
In later years, focus returned to Red Hat licensing, and I was strongly encouraged to reinstall my Oracle Linux systems (which had grown greatly, as they were free). I resisted vehemently, objecting to an inferior kernel (compared to the UEK), reduced hardware support, and the pointless inconvenience of license keys, activation, and renewals for a product of generally lower quality.
Fortunately, I have avoided this inconvenience.
In light of the decades of Red Hat's behavior, I will say one thing: you reap what you sow.
- yjftsjthsd-h 6y ago> In light of the decades of Red Hat's behavior, I will say one thing: you reap what you sow. I'm surprised to hear you say that, because this is exactly why I personally won't touch anything from Oracle with a ten-foot pole; I'm not fond of RH yanking support, but we're talking about the company that is known throughout the industry for license audits and calls from legal as a sales strategy. Is there some reason why you trust this particular product more?